proskynneo

coiny mccoinface

@heimindanger, I did some digging on the API call you were using and the fields in question. As you reported, the fields exist, but aren't being updated correctly. I can confirm that this is a bug. We

They might have the high ground, but at least you've got the perfect body.

This algorithm is a global and is not limited to a single user's behavior/experience. It would run into some weird behavior if nobody posted anything in 30 days, but we don't expect it to happen.

Too much interdependence between subsystems. The reward balance allows us to track account balances without needing to track content or votes.

This is a required architectural change for the blockchain to support scaling in the future. If it doesn't happen now, it will need to happen someday for us to support mainstream user growth.

The current algorithm looks at all posts and gives each one their fair share as if every post were to get paid out right now. i.e. If your post has 1% of rshares2, you get 1% of the reward fund. The new

Reputation is not a consensus level feature of the blockchain. Meaning it is derived from state, but does not impact state. We have no plans on making it consensus. There were bugs in the bandwidth rate

We will be proposing a hardfork date when the release is finalized.

I appreciated seeing the p-values but unfortunately they completely invalidate the study in my opinion. A p-value of 0.08 is not statistically significant. The highest p-value I have seen considered

Mining is done as an operation on the Steem blockchain. The data section can contain whatever the developer wants it to. Steem has its own format of how people can take actions. Let's say you want to transfer

Correct!

They do, but it isn't directly for block production. It uses a similar technique of increasing a nonce to create a number with a certain number of leading 0s. However, instead of producing a block with

One of the many things that differentiates Steem from Bitcoin is that we don't mine the blocks. Steem does not require that block IDs start with any number of leading 0's. This allows us to create blocks

There are some known bugs in the tags plugin for steemd that aren't returning correct data used to show trending tags. Several other tags have noticed they weren't showing up in the trending tags when

That is correct. We have stated many times that propagating curation reward back to the delegator is too expensive computationally.

I have skimmed through the comments and did not see anyone mention delegated Steem Power. (Apologies is I missed it) As a whale I want to see the value my stake increase. There are a few ways I can go

I was going to bring up this point exactly. The argument can be made that sexual satisfaction is just as visceral a need as hunger and thirst (although maybe not as often for most of us). Does this mean

I was trying to point out that the storage requirements impart centralization and thus the potential for censorship on the content that already exists on the blockchain if we were to be naive and simply

While I understand your desire for uncensored multimedia, there are some technical difficulties doing so. Let's assume that the witnesses increased the block size so that an image or even a video could