Discover
Waves
Decks
Login
Discover
Waves
Decks
Buy perks
Login
Signup
54
schachoberhessen
Available
Used
Resource Credits
51 Followers
63 Following
December 4, 2018
RSS feed
Comments
Blog
Posts
Comments
Communities
Wallet
Mute
Center
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
9M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Tournament Formats Option C
I disagree, I think that my argument does make a lot of sense. I just can repeat what I wrote in this comment (and you maybe don't read): "Unfornately Splinterlands has left this goal behind startung
$ 0.000
4
1
schachoberhessen
splinterlands
9M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal: Brawl - Count all frays equally with examples about effects (tier 1-4)
The question is what is a penalty - You will with this change in every case loose not even one point but can win a lot of points, so I think it is no penalty. The other question is how it is in other
$ 0.000
4
1
schachoberhessen
splinterlands
9M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal: Brawl - Count all frays equally with examples about effects (tier 1-4)
"If a guild doesnt have a member that can fill those frays, then they need to recruit to fill it." Or rent cards for this frays in the rental market.
$ 0.000
4
1
schachoberhessen
splinterlands
9M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal: Brawl - Count all frays equally with examples about effects (tier 1-4)
First, as far as I know there isn't an Alpha/Beta-Fray anymore - I think he was changed to Alpha/Beta/Untamed what should IMO help a lot as you can play it now with cards from the Untamed Set. Second,
$ 0.000
4
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
9M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Tournament Formats Option C
If they would keep what they told when releasing Untamed all would be fine: Unfornately Splinterlands has left this goal behind startung with submitting the legandary Untamed Summoner so that now nobody
$ 0.000
4
3
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
10M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Community Proposals Guidelines
Yes, I don't like the game "who is the winner and who is the loser" and as you can see we are all losers now when it comes to tournaments because some people really wanted to come out as winners
$ 0.000
0
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
10M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Community Proposals Guidelines
I would definitely agree with this as it would be much less than the requirement of the proposal, tbh I have not checked the last 10 proposals but from the last successfzll proposal (to the time I wrote
$ 0.000
0
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
10M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Community Proposals Guidelines
Yes I completely agree with you, about the noise in discord. But IMO this can be managed, I mention some possible solutions where one would be the slow mode. How it runs in the moment that a lot of people
$ 0.200
2
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
10M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Community Proposals Guidelines
When I see that in the last finished proposal 221.210.628 staked SPS took part what is less than 30% of the totally staked-SPS from (744,252,423) than this 10% means 33,6% of the voting staked SPS. We
$ 0.253
3
2
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
10M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Community Proposals Guidelines
Everybody - also you - can burn DEC from his own wallet and submit a proposal directly without the DAO.
$ 0.025
2
2
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
10M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Restrict Gladiator Cards Below Silver League
In the end it is not conrolled cause 66.67% from the staked SPS is really a lot, but when you consider that normally only 30%-40% of the staked SPS really vote and that not need "only" 33,34%
$ 0.030
2
2
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
10M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Community Proposals Guidelines
For me the question is not who win and who loose but maybe we can find an acceptable compromise and have no looser but we are maybe two winner ... would this be possible or at least imaginable ?
$ 0.029
2
2
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
10M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Community Proposals Guidelines
Thank you for your oppinion. You understand that 10% is for me absolutely fine if taken from the voting SPS but when it is taken from the staked SPS it would be (with the last passed proposal) 33,6% so
$ 0.030
2
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
10M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Restrict Gladiator Cards Below Silver League
I agree that Gladiator should NEVER added to ranked play at ALL and it was promised when they come out that will be only playable in brawls, however I am strictly against THIS proposal because it doesn't
$ 0.028
2
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
10M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Restrict Gladiator Cards Below Silver League
Yes Ouora can be countered, for example also from the Goblin Psychic with Affliction - Unfornately the Goblin Psychic get Affliction only at Level 4 and so this counter doesn't work in bronze league. How
$ 0.028
2
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
10M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Restrict Gladiator Cards Below Silver League
In general I agree, but: "Players will farm more useless cards. Will you play a 6 mana cost summoner with no abilities? (soulbound so it cannot be traded or sold)" Here you oversee somthing -
$ 0.028
2
4
schachoberhessen
splinterlands
10M
RE: Splinterlands - DAO-Proposal: Brawl - Count all frays equally:
Thank you !
$ 0.028
2
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
10M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Community Proposals Guidelines
"The burden of proof for a Community Proposal will be higher than normal proposals and require at least 10% of staked SPS voting in favor and having at least 2/3rds positive sentiment to advance to
$ 0.028
2
7
schachoberhessen
HiveDevs
10M
RE: "Why am I being downvoted by @hive-defender and its trail?? 😡 😠🤬"
Hello, I think yes. Thank you !
$ 0.000
0
schachoberhessen
spsproposal
10M
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Update Tournament Formatting and Reward Allocations
why did the price of all cards fall so much? Cause without Alpha-tournaments you have no usecase for this cards anymore, so Alpha-Card drop a lot in price. Cause without access to modern tournaments you
$ 0.044
1