Did you ever wonder why all "terror attacks" aim at public venues / civilians, but never strike government buildings / police headquarters / power plants and the like? Cui bono?
(Only exception that comes to mind would prolly be the "attack" on the pentagon on 9/11, which of course was fake af)
Did you ever wonder how the "culprits" can be identified within 24h, oftentimes even faster?
Did you ever wonder why there are only two terrorist stereotypes, the "lone shooter" (mostly stateside) and the "radical muslim" (mainly in Europe)?
Did you ever ask yourself how the "victims" (read: ➡️ vicsims) of a "terror attack" are able to write twitter messages or posts on facebook while there is an "active shooter" on the loose?
Did you ever ask yourself how swiftly the go-fraud-me-account is set up after a ➡️ drillusion?
Did you ever ask yourself how quickly the "survivors" or the "relatives" of the "deceased" ➡️ vicsims recover and are able to give interviews days or even hours after the event? Also: no signs of stress, shock or genuine grief, but tearless crying and duper's delight instead? In the case of Orlando Pulse the ➡️ vicsims interviewed lying (no pun intended) in a hospital bed are not even wearing infirmary attire but their private clothes instead...? Check out these twins from the phoney fake show in LV:
How come the "perpetrator" is always known to the FBI or other "authorities" before the event?
How come schools fall victim to an "active shooter" every other week, although they've been trained how to manage such a scenario? Apparently Stoneman Douglas has conducted multiple drills, but still failed to protect their students...
How come that there is always a drill taking place days before or at the exact date of the event?
Why is it that the ubiquitous surveillance cameras miraculously don't work on the day of the event or only show blurry / useless footage? Also: the cell phone footage presented by "witnesses" are of similar worthlessness (VHS-type-quality in our digital era).
Why is is that the "authorites" never produce death certificates of the alleged victims? Ever noticed that the alleged victims / "deceased terrorists" are oftentimes alive and kicking? (Most notably at least seven of the alleged hijackers on 9/11)
Why is it that within a short period after the news of a "terror attack" breaks, you'll already find an entry about it on wikipedia? Not to mention sometimes infos about the event are online even DAYS IN ADVANCE...?
Don't you find it conveniant that the alleged assassin(s) is / are executed on the spot? Or, if not that, convicted in a ridiculously fake trial?
Wouldn't you agree that strangely no matter how much CCTV cameras there are / safety arrangements are carried out / extension of police state is gradually established, "terror attacks" and "mass shootings" are happening almost every other day?
Don't you think it's peculiar that the ones that are doing all the work of a police detective / investigative journalist (➡️ crisis facting) are met with vehement opposition, and are portrayed as conspiracy nuts that might very well be the ones that commit the next mass shooting? Which one is more outrageous: Terrorize children with drills and traumatize the populace with staged events and fake news or saying "This event is not an accomplished fact. The burden of proof lies upon the media – as long as they can't come up with actual proof, I be auto-hoaxing. Nobody cried, nobody died."
Lemme know in the comments if there are more questions ought to be asked, I'm sure the list is incomplete.
Words by They Lie We See / switzerflatland
Definition of ➡️ vicsim:
https://steemit.com/crisisactor/@switzerflatland/6gpdls-conspiracy-realist-lingo
Definition of ➡️ drillusion:
https://steemit.com/terrordrill/@switzerflatland/99mps-conspiracy-realist-lingo
Definition of ➡️ crisis facting:
https://steemit.com/crisisactor/@switzerflatland/conspiracy-realist-lingo
