Si prefieres la versión en español, haz clic en el siguiente enlace 👉 AQUÍ
𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚙𝚝 𝚘𝚏 ‘𝚐𝚘𝚘𝚍 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚎𝚟𝚒𝚕’ 𝚒𝚜 𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚝𝚢'𝚜 𝚘𝚕𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚝 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚖𝚘𝚜𝚝 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚡 𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚖𝚊𝚜. 𝚂𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚎 𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚕, 𝚠𝚎 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚜𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜, 𝚜𝚎𝚎𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊 𝚞𝚗𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚊𝚕 𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐. 𝙷𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛, 𝙸 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚕𝚞𝚜𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚠𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚍 𝚐𝚘𝚘𝚍 𝚋𝚢 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚖𝚊𝚢 𝚋𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚎𝚗 𝚊𝚜 𝚎𝚟𝚒𝚕 𝚋𝚢 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚟𝚒𝚌𝚎 𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚊. 𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚒𝚜 𝚠𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚖𝚊𝚔𝚎𝚜 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚜𝚘 𝚏𝚊𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚗𝚍, 𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚊𝚖𝚎 𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚎, 𝚜𝚘 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚋𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚌.
𝙸 𝚛𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚎𝚛 𝚊 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚏𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚕𝚢 𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚒𝚐𝚞𝚒𝚝𝚢. 𝙰 𝚋𝚘𝚢, 𝚠𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚜𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚊 𝚏𝚒𝚜𝚑 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚊𝚙𝚙𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚎 𝚍𝚛𝚘𝚠𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐, 𝚙𝚞𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚍 𝚒𝚝 𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚠𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚍 𝚒𝚝 𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚜𝚊𝚗𝚍. 𝙵𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚋𝚘𝚢'𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎, 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚊𝚌𝚝 𝚠𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚐𝚘𝚘𝚍𝚗𝚎𝚜𝚜; 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚠𝚊𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚜𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚊 𝚕𝚒𝚏𝚎. 𝚆𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚑𝚎 𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚗'𝚝 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚎, 𝚑𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛, 𝚠𝚊𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚋𝚢 𝚙𝚞𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚏𝚒𝚜𝚑 𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚠𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚛, 𝚑𝚎 𝚠𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚒𝚝𝚜 𝚍𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚑. 𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎 𝚊𝚌𝚝 𝚜𝚑𝚘𝚠𝚜 𝚑𝚘𝚠 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜, 𝚑𝚘𝚠𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚠𝚎𝚕𝚕-𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚍, 𝚌𝚊𝚗 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚎𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚟𝚒𝚎𝚠𝚎𝚍 𝚍𝚒𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚕𝚢 𝚋𝚢 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚜.
𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚎𝚡𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎 𝚕𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚜 𝚖𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝 𝚘𝚗 𝚑𝚘𝚠 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚢 𝚊 𝚌𝚛𝚞𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚛𝚘𝚕𝚎 𝚒𝚗 𝚍𝚎𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚠𝚛𝚘𝚗𝚐. 𝚆𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚖𝚊𝚢 𝚋𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚎𝚗 𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚗 𝚑𝚘𝚗𝚘𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚊𝚌𝚝 𝚒𝚗 𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚖𝚊𝚢 𝚋𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚍 𝚘𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚘𝚛 𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚒𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛. 𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚍𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚘𝚏 𝚘𝚙𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚋𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚎𝚏 𝚒𝚜 𝚠𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚎𝚗𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚑𝚎𝚜 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚊𝚕𝚜𝚘 𝚠𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚏𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚝 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚖𝚒𝚜𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐.
𝙸𝚗 𝚖𝚢 𝚕𝚒𝚏𝚎, 𝙸 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚕𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚗𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚠𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚓𝚞𝚍𝚐𝚎 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚜𝚘𝚕𝚎𝚕𝚢 𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚋𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚘𝚠𝚗 𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚞𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚜. 𝙸𝚝 𝚒𝚜 𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚛𝚢 𝚝𝚘 𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚋𝚎𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚙𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚓𝚞𝚍𝚐𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝. 𝙴𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚝𝚑𝚢 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚝𝚘𝚘𝚕𝚜 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚗𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚐𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚡 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚜𝚌𝚊𝚙𝚎.
𝚃𝚊𝚔𝚎, 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚎𝚡𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎, 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚍𝚒𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚜 𝚒𝚗 𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚎 𝚜𝚢𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚜 𝚒𝚗 𝚟𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚞𝚜 𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚎𝚜. 𝙸𝚗 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚒𝚎𝚜, 𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚋𝚞𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚜𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚙𝚞𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚑𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚎𝚗 𝚊𝚜 𝚗𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚛𝚢 𝚝𝚘 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚗 𝚘𝚛𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚎. 𝙸𝚗 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚜, 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚌𝚞𝚜 𝚒𝚜 𝚘𝚗 𝚛𝚎𝚑𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚛𝚎𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚘𝚏 𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚝𝚢. 𝙽𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚜𝚎 𝚊𝚙𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚊𝚌𝚑𝚎𝚜 𝚒𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝 𝚘𝚛 𝚠𝚛𝚘𝚗𝚐; 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚢 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚎𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌 𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚜.
‘𝚁𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚆𝚛𝚘𝚗𝚐’ 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚊𝚋𝚜𝚘𝚕𝚞𝚝𝚎𝚜; 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚏𝚕𝚞𝚒𝚍 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚙𝚝𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚍𝚎𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚍 𝚘𝚗 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎, 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝, 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚌𝚒𝚛𝚌𝚞𝚖𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚎. 𝚃𝚑𝚎 𝚔𝚎𝚢 𝚝𝚘 𝚗𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚐𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚕𝚒𝚎𝚜 𝚒𝚗 𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚝𝚑𝚢, 𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐, 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚊𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚝𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚢. 𝙾𝚗𝚕𝚢 𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚠𝚊𝚢 𝚌𝚊𝚗 𝚠𝚎 𝚑𝚘𝚙𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚞𝚒𝚕𝚍 𝚊 𝚠𝚘𝚛𝚕𝚍 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚍𝚒𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚘 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚍𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚎 𝚞𝚜, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚎𝚗𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚑 𝚞𝚜.
You are cordially invited to participate. A theme for each day. It is a proposal of the #humanitas Community. In the following links you will find all the necessary information. We are waiting for you… @silher, @chironga67, and @atreyuserver.
INITIATIVE: A theme for everч dαч (October 2024)
CREDITS:
Image:
CoolText
Dedicɑted to ɑll those poets who contɾibute, dɑγ bγ dɑγ, to mɑke ouɾ plɑnet ɑ betteɾ woɾld.
𝙴𝚕 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚙𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚎 “𝚎𝚕 𝚋𝚒𝚎𝚗 𝚢 𝚎𝚕 𝚖𝚊𝚕” 𝚎𝚜 𝚞𝚗𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚜 𝚏𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚜𝚘́𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚘𝚜 𝚖𝚊́𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚐𝚞𝚘𝚜 𝚢 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚓𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍. 𝙳𝚎𝚜𝚍𝚎 𝚝𝚒𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚜, 𝚑𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚛 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜, 𝚋𝚞𝚜𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚞𝚗𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚘́𝚗 𝚞𝚗𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚊𝚕. 𝚂𝚒𝚗 𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚘, 𝚑𝚎 𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚊 𝚕𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚕𝚞𝚜𝚒𝚘́𝚗 𝚍𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚕𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚋𝚒𝚎𝚗 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚞𝚗𝚘𝚜, 𝚙𝚞𝚎𝚍𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚖𝚊𝚕 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚘𝚝𝚛𝚘𝚜 𝚢 𝚟𝚒𝚌𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚊. 𝙴𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚎𝚜 𝚕𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚑𝚊𝚌𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚗𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊 𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚊 𝚝𝚊𝚗 𝚏𝚊𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚢, 𝚊𝚕 𝚖𝚒𝚜𝚖𝚘 𝚝𝚒𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚘, 𝚝𝚊𝚗 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚋𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚊́𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊.
𝚁𝚎𝚌𝚞𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚘 𝚞𝚗𝚊 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊́𝚋𝚘𝚕𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚒𝚕𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚏𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚒𝚐𝚞̈𝚎𝚍𝚊𝚍 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚕. 𝚄𝚗 𝚗𝚒𝚗̃𝚘, 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚜𝚊𝚕𝚟𝚊𝚛 𝚊 𝚞𝚗 𝚙𝚎𝚣 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚒́𝚊 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚛 𝚊𝚑𝚘𝚐𝚊́𝚗𝚍𝚘𝚜𝚎, 𝚕𝚘 𝚜𝚊𝚌𝚘́ 𝚍𝚎𝚕 𝚊𝚐𝚞𝚊 𝚢 𝚕𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚌𝚘́ 𝚎𝚗 𝚕𝚊 𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚊. 𝙳𝚎𝚜𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚕 𝚗𝚒𝚗̃𝚘, 𝚎𝚕 𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚘 𝚎𝚛𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚋𝚘𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚍 𝚙𝚞𝚛𝚊; 𝚜𝚞 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚘́𝚗 𝚎𝚛𝚊 𝚜𝚊𝚕𝚟𝚊𝚛 𝚞𝚗𝚊 𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚊. 𝚂𝚒𝚗 𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚘, 𝚕𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎́𝚕 𝚗𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚒́𝚊 𝚎𝚛𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎, 𝚊𝚕 𝚜𝚊𝚌𝚊𝚛 𝚊𝚕 𝚙𝚎𝚣 𝚍𝚎𝚕 𝚊𝚐𝚞𝚊, 𝚎𝚗 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍 𝚕𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚋𝚊 𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚕𝚊 𝚖𝚞𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚎. 𝙴𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎 𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚘 𝚖𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊 𝚌𝚘́𝚖𝚘 𝚗𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜, 𝚊𝚞𝚗𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚋𝚒𝚎𝚗 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚍𝚊𝚜, 𝚙𝚞𝚎𝚍𝚎𝚗 𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚛 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚎𝚌𝚞𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚜𝚘𝚗 𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚎𝚛𝚊 𝚍𝚒𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚘𝚝𝚛𝚘𝚜.
𝙴𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚎𝚓𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚘 𝚖𝚎 𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚟𝚊 𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚛 𝚜𝚘𝚋𝚛𝚎 𝚌𝚘́𝚖𝚘 𝚎𝚕 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚘 𝚢 𝚕𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊 𝚓𝚞𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚞𝚗 𝚙𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚕 𝚌𝚛𝚞𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚎𝚗 𝚕𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘́𝚗 𝚍𝚎𝚕 𝚋𝚒𝚎𝚗 𝚢 𝚎𝚕 𝚖𝚊𝚕. 𝙻𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎𝚗 𝚞𝚗𝚊 𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊 𝚙𝚞𝚎𝚍𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚞𝚗 𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚘 𝚑𝚘𝚗𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎, 𝚎𝚗 𝚘𝚝𝚛𝚊 𝚙𝚞𝚎𝚍𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚘𝚏𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚟𝚘 𝚘 𝚒𝚗𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚕. 𝙴𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚍𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍 𝚍𝚎 𝚘𝚙𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜 𝚢 𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚎𝚜 𝚕𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎𝚗𝚛𝚒𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚌𝚎 𝚗𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚊, 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚘 𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚒𝚎́𝚗 𝚕𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚛𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚏𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚢 𝚖𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚘𝚜.
𝙴𝚗 𝚖𝚒 𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚊, 𝚑𝚎 𝚊𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚗𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚓𝚞𝚣𝚐𝚊𝚛 𝚊 𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚊́𝚜 𝚞́𝚗𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚋𝚊𝚜𝚊́𝚗𝚍𝚘𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚎𝚗 𝚗𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚙𝚒𝚘𝚜 𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚢 𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚙𝚒𝚘𝚜. 𝙴𝚜 𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚕 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚛 𝚍𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚎𝚕 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚘 𝚢 𝚕𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚘𝚝𝚛𝚘𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚎𝚖𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚛 𝚞𝚗 𝚓𝚞𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚘. 𝙻𝚊 𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚝𝚒́𝚊 𝚢 𝚕𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚘́𝚗 𝚜𝚘𝚗 𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚛𝚊𝚖𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚗𝚊𝚟𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚛 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚓𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚒𝚜𝚊𝚓𝚎 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚕.
𝚃𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜, 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚎𝚓𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚘, 𝚕𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚒𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚎𝚗 𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚜𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚎𝚗 𝚍𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚊𝚜 𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚜. 𝙴𝚗 𝚊𝚕𝚐𝚞𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚜, 𝚕𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚋𝚞𝚌𝚒𝚘́𝚗 𝚢 𝚎𝚕 𝚌𝚊𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚐𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚘 𝚜𝚘𝚗 𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚗𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚛 𝚎𝚕 𝚘𝚛𝚍𝚎𝚗 𝚢 𝚕𝚊 𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚊. 𝙴𝚗 𝚘𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚜, 𝚎𝚕 𝚎𝚗𝚏𝚘𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊́ 𝚎𝚗 𝚕𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚑𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘́𝚗 𝚢 𝚕𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘́𝚗 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚞𝚘𝚜 𝚎𝚗 𝚕𝚊 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚍𝚊𝚍. 𝙽𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚗𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚎𝚗𝚏𝚘𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜 𝚎𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚒́𝚗𝚜𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚘 𝚘 𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚘; 𝚜𝚘𝚗 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚢 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚒́𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚘𝚜.
“𝙴𝚕 𝙱𝚒𝚎𝚗 𝚢 𝙴𝚕 𝙼𝚊𝚕” 𝚗𝚘 𝚜𝚘𝚗 𝚊𝚋𝚜𝚘𝚕𝚞𝚝𝚘𝚜; 𝚜𝚘𝚗 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚙𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚏𝚕𝚞𝚒𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚗 𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊, 𝚎𝚕 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚘 𝚢 𝚕𝚊𝚜 𝚌𝚒𝚛𝚌𝚞𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚜. 𝙻𝚊 𝚌𝚕𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚗𝚊𝚟𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚛 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚓𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎 𝚎𝚗 𝚕𝚊 𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚝𝚒́𝚊, 𝚕𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚘́𝚗 𝚢 𝚕𝚊 𝚊𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚝𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍. 𝚂𝚘𝚕𝚘 𝚊𝚜𝚒́ 𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚛 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚒𝚛 𝚞𝚗 𝚖𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚍𝚘𝚗𝚍𝚎 𝚕𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚒𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚗𝚘 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚗, 𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚎𝚗𝚛𝚒𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚣𝚌𝚊𝚗.
Estás cordialmente invitado a participar. Un tema para cada día. Es una propuesta de la Comunidad #humanitas. En el siguiente enlaces encontrarás toda la información necesaria. Te esperamos… @cirangela, @felpach, y @lauril.
INICIATIVA: Un temα pαrα cαdα dı́α (octubre 2024)
Dedicɑdo ɑ todos ɑquellos que contɾibuγen, díɑ ɑ díɑ, ɑ hɑceɾ de nuestɾo plɑnetɑ, un mundo mejoɾ.
Dedicɑdo ɑ todos ɑquellos que contɾibuγen, díɑ ɑ díɑ, ɑ hɑceɾ de nuestɾo plɑnetɑ, un mundo mejoɾ.