https://images.app.goo.gl/Pp66PW6ibG6hNpXd9
Most of us are aware of the forced organ harvesting in China performed on dissidents such as the Falun Gong. Although most of the focus on this reprehensible practice has been exposed by the alternative media, some of it has spilled over into the public consciousness a bit more than the organ pushers and the medical profession are comfortable with- or- how do you make an unacceptable horrific practice more palatable to the public? Pass a law making it legal. Remember, everything Hitler did was perfectly legal and above boards- it even had the support of the German people. For whatever reason, even after over 2000 years of "civilization," people still seem unable to differentiate between legal and moral- nowhere better displayed than by the issue of abortion, bit that's for another post.
We all- those of us not suffering from cognitive dissonance- know about organ harvesting during the Bosnian conflict performed by doctors associated with the Red Cross (perhaps the world's largest purveyors of organs- legal and otherwise) and other NGOs. The conflicts in the Middle East have seen a profound increase in organ harvesting the organization of the practice becoming more sophisticated, performed by corporations such as DynCorp (who handles transportation logistics) after the organs are removed by groups such as the White Helmets as revealed by alternative journalists such as Vanessa Beeley.
The fact is, the market for human organs is gigantic and voluntary donations simply can't come close to keeping up with demand. In the US, many hospitals in the Chicago, along with university hospitals are taking the organs from the victims of gang violence. One consequence of the law of supply and demand- wherever there is demand, someone will find a way to increase supply... for evidence, just look at the illegal drug trade, one of the most profitable parts of the black market. Now the People's Republic of Canadastan has found a solution to the overwhelming demand for organs, as well as a way to offset the costs of it's disastrous Socialist health care system- organ harvesting through euthanasia. One thing to bear in mind- as the demand for organs increases, the standards for preserving life will decrease exponentially.
About three weeks ago, I penned this article talking about Canada’s euthanasia laws being extended to diseases/illnesses such as Alzheimer’s and dementia while the government pushed a hospice organization to engage in euthanasia as part of a palliative care regimen. Normally, I avoid writing in the first person because I want the information to stand on its own and provide a commentary to get readers to think. But, with new information coming out of Canada on this same subject, I will use first-person viewpoint to relay the information and commentary.
Palliative care (I had to look that one up) is centered around "quality of life," and if there's one thing we learned from Obamacare is that when the government is allowed to determine quality of life deaths occur, usually on a grand scale- remember Obamacare gave us the "death panels," bureaucrats tasked with determining quality of life. In other words, if you're worth more to the government dead- in terms of organ value- your life will essentially be determined to be without quality.
Well, the new information coming out of Canada now, as reported by PJ Media, is the government of Canada actually bragging that “assisted suicide”, aka murder by physician, is providing an ample supply of donated organs for individuals awaiting organ transplants. The source article appeared in The Ottawa Citizen on January 6, 2020. The key player in all of this latest push for “assisted suicide”, a term that is such a misnomer that I will refer to it as government-sanctioned physician murder, came out of the George Soros organization, Open Society Institute, which funded a study/report called “Project on Death in America” from 1994 to 1997. Before reading any further, take the time to read carefully all the source articles.
George Soros, if you remember, hates America and is doing everything in his power to hasten our demise. The last couple of paragraphs of his speech is nothing but a concoction of lies and disinformation... these people act as though death is a relatively new phenomenon demanding their intervention. The fact is people have been dying for as long as there have been people. The only thing they're trying to do is justify their intervention and stealing their organs.
This brings me to that hotly-debated subject, physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. This is the one aspect of dying that is talked about everywhere – on television, in public forums, in newspaper headlines, and serious journal articles and in the courts. I believe in personal autonomy; I believe people should be allowed to determine their own end. But I also recognize that legalizing euthanasia could have unintended consequences, leading to all kinds of abuses. The issues need to be carefully weighed. Very few terminally ill patients would avail themselves of the opportunity even if euthanasia were legalized. After all, my mother refused my help, and I am glad she did. The Project on Death in America concerns itself with the vast majority of people who are not looking for physician-assisted suicide, and they have their work cut out for them.
As people come to terms with death, recognizing it as a fact of life, then the demand for physician-assisted suicide, as well as for unnecessary medical interventions, will drop. That is one way I hope our efforts will influence the culture of dying.
Thanks, but no thanks George- we don't need your help either with living or dying. "While Soros touted this as a push for more expansion for hospice care, it actually placed the notion of “murder by physician” as an option because there was not anyone that I ever cared for who was dying that even mentioned a physician using any method to murder them." Here's how they sell this to the public: (From the Ottawa Citizen newspaper)
Ontarians who opt for medically assisted deaths (MAiD) are increasingly saving or improving other people’s lives by also including organ and tissue donation as part of their final wishes. “The decision to pursue MAiD is totally separate from the decision to donate organs,” cautions Ronnie Gavsie, Trillium’s chief executive officer, “but we do want patients to have their last will carried out.”
And her we come to the crux of the matter:
Canada decriminalized medically assisted death in 2016, and Ontario, through Trillium, immediately moved to the forefront of organ and tissue donation through MAiD, becoming the first jurisdiction in the world to proactively reach out to those who had been approved for assisted death to discuss donation. When a death is imminent, whether through a hospital or MAiD, Trillium must by law be notified.
And the pressure to donate is exerted on the patient and his family. So, to increase the organs for donation, the law requires the agency that oversees organ and tissue donation to be notified. How convenient. Thanks to the government sanctioned physician murder Canada’s organ and tissue donations are increasing. Imagine that. This sanitized piece by the Ottawa Citizen never mentions the pressure the government of Canada is placing upon hospices to engage in government sanctioned physician murder as part of palliative care or face their facility being closed, which was covered in the article I penned on December 16, 2019 for Sons of Liberty Media.
Just as abortion is deceptively labelled "women's healthcare" and "the right to choose," Canada's legalized murder plan is parsed in acceptable, noble-sounding phraseology: “And, as part of high-quality end-of life care, we make sure that all patients and families are provided with the information they need and the opportunity to make a decision on whether they wish to make a donation,” Gavsie says. “That just follows the logical protocol under the law and the humane approach for those who are undergoing medical assistance in dying. And it’s the right thing to do for those on the wait list.”
What this likely means is that if you don't comply, you lose your healthcare benefits- that's what is in the "information" that's provided to "end of life patients," the consequences of not going along with the theft of your own organs. But there are other factors at play as well:
There are factors, however, that stack against MAiD patients becoming donors. Those with cancer, for example, which according to a 2018 Canadian Blood Services report accounts for 57 per cent of MAiD deaths in Canada, cannot donate organs. Additionally, current laws stipulate that organ donors must die in a hospital, whereas many MAiD patients choose to die in their homes. (Tissues, however, such as eyes, heart valves, bone tendons and skin, can be recovered following home deaths.)
However, the Canadian government has considered these factors as well- now they use propaganda- and coercion I'm sure- to convince the dying to meet their demise in a proper facility rather than at home as they first wished. “The striking thing about patients who have medical assistance in dying is that they have a very clear vision about what they want, and they have the capacity to make their own decisions. We want people to hear about the opportunities they have and then make the right choice for them. There are several patients we’ve spoken to who had initially planned to die at home, but that wasn’t as important to them as helping other people.” [emphasis added] It sounds like the "right choice" is less for the benefit for the patient than the benefit for the state.
I refuse to believe that individuals who are terminally ill, dying from any disease or illness, actually place more importance to helping other people than dying at home or any other concern. Believe me, I have provided care to dying individuals and worked in hospice care for a number of years in my career. Not one time did any individual ever mention organ donation, which was a possibility for many of my patients. Their main concern was their family, their spouse, their relationship with God regarding salvation, and whether or not adequate relief from pain was possible. So, this peddled garbage about it being more important to help someone else when these patients are dying is questionable at best. And, none of the patients I cared for even suggested they would welcome government-sanctioned physician death and neither did any of the family members.
Let's call this what it really is- government sponsored death- by, for, and benefiting one entity only, the government in their attempts to keep up with the pressing demands for organs. Wherever the government goes, corruption is bound to follow. This entire notion is absolutely outrageously egregious. It violates God’s commandment, “thou shalt not murder”. Why is that so hard to understand? There are laws against murder in every State in the united States of America, and Canada, I’m sure. But, government decided murder of the unborn was okay – America stood by. Government decided that murder of babies during birth is okay – Americans stood by. Government decided that murder of infants after birth was okay – Americans stood by. Government decided in four states – Oregon, Montana, Washington, and Vermont, murder of terminally ill individuals by physicians is okay. And, again Americans stood by. Murder on any level is wrong and illegal. Government legislating that is it okay to murder when you are a physician is wrong, period, end of story.
Our moral/ethical code has been stood on its head- inverted. Good is now evil and evil good. Our nation was founded on certain principles- life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness (you can interpret that one any way you like). Now we have a government without principles run by unprincipled individuals. 2 Timothy 3 King James Version (KJV)
3 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.
2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,
3 Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,
4 Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;
Our Constitution is a covenant between the government and "we the people." For over 200 years lawyers have looked for loopholes and ways to enhance the power of government and diminish the power of the people... and they've been very successful. Our rights are derived from God, not government- but the government, particularly the Democrats, have convinced people the opposite is true. Canada and the US have far more in common than differences, speaking culturally. The US currently has four states where doctor assisted suicide is allowed and we can expect more at any time. The demand for organs here in the US far outstrips Canada and once the Democrats see that this is working there you can expect a push here.
Ottawa Citizen
✔@OttawaCitizen
· Jan 6, 2020
Medically assisted deaths provide boost to organ donation in Ontario
“The More People That We Kill, The More People We Can Save!” — Catchy PSA tag
This is Fascism- the individual is only useful insofar as he benefits the state. Perhaps a more truthful tag would be: "Hurry up and die, we need your organs more than you do... if you need help call your doctor." Our society (both here and in Canada) is heading in a dangerous direction. Abortion has essentially demolished the sanctity of human life and what's happening in Canada is just a logical consequence, likely to happen in the US sooner than you think.
