More new projects?
That's great, do you know what the problem is?
that perhaps steemit has never come to develop his potential of his primary project?
The simplest of all.
A blogging platform, Is that simple, useful and commercial?
Instead of a platform that looks more like a forum on the steem blockchain itself and its projects, but with people publishing things in the middle........
I have no idea in whose hands.
But of what I am absolutely sure.
It is that Steemit requires a great change, in the way of thinking of witnesses / maintainers / owners / managers / curators / whales.
Call it X
By and to absolutely reform the methodology of use, organization, management, dissemination, participation and participation in the benefits of the platform.
If not. It is impossible for this to advance and reach the competence of other external platforms.
It is impossible for Steemit to become an easy-to-use platform for thousands of new users to reach.
If the cover of Steemit is full of content for aliens .. 24 hours a day, 365 days a year..
That's what people think, when you show them Steemit.
Is that what you want? Perfect.
Let's make everything stay the same. But..
So. Do not say that this is a blogging platform. Call it the Steemit forum, or something like that.
That way you don't cheat the user, who is not addicted to Steemit.
That he understands absolutely nothing of what the world of blockchains is; and also do not try to attract these types of users.
Because it is absolutely unfeasible.
Attracting people for money, which is what Steemit has done until today.
Exclusively, it can generate a rotten community..
I don't give a fuck who or what ends up controlling Steemit. I don't give a shit about the value of Steem's cryptocurrency today.
But I only know one thing.
In two years watching the project.
Progress could be valued at 0. And Steemit's advertising work has been an absolute joke during all this time.
Changes are needed. Many, many, many changes.
Much more than the creation of new projects.
It is necessary to perfect the platform from top to bottom. Consolidate the projects that really work.
Make a good plan for collective dissemination. And no, that is not based on making publications within Steemit.
It is based on turning Steemit into a world of ease, naturalness, plasticity, simplicity, of finding market niches further away from people involved in cryptocurrencies.
Beyond people interested in disgusting money.
Make Steemit a beautiful place to post. Organized. Modern.
Content that does not always talk about cryptocurrencies and Steemit.
Remove all garbage from healers. It does not work. It is just a garbage system, in which they themselves generate garbage.
Remove all trash from bots. Hide the votes.
Create in Steemit a platform with the content that consumes the rest of the world, but that in steemit crashes.
Win users to generate enough publicity to benefit witnesses. Instead of having to make a profit based on the generation of technical publications.
For example.. Etc. Etc. Etc.
Manage social networks correctly. So far they have been practically dead, and Steemit's name has been absorbed by hundreds of unreliable people.
That makes the platform look discredited worldwide, again and again.
There is no seriousness.......
You see it? You want to continue creating more and more projects. More and more evolutions?
And it turns out that Steemit has not reached 30 or 40 percent of its total real potential.
Much less has come to touch perfection in its design and in what it can offer.
Start creating hundreds of other projects. That the only thing they serve is for to divide more; the small existing community that by itself is already too divided.
Why Steemit does not constantly promote adherent communities. As if they were all part of one, transmitting unity. For example?
Etc etc. etc.
Changes. Changes are needed, what has been done so far does not work; and the line of segregation of projects and users that is being favored.
It will never work. Never.
RE: Witness Voting, OpenSeed and OpenLink