RE: RE: [PROXY] @proxy.token disagrees with 0.22.2 soft fork and revoked voting to witnesses who agreed with that.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: [PROXY] @proxy.token disagrees with 0.22.2 soft fork and revoked voting to witnesses who agreed with that.

RE: [PROXY] @proxy.token disagrees with 0.22.2 soft fork and revoked voting to witnesses who agreed with that.

Centralization is exactly what the witnesses were doing so far, seizing absolutely the entire platform in their favor.

Through donations to all communities of curators and with the control and management of bots, and all projects that were born within Steemit.

Your comment makes no sense. Unless you are blind or part of the beneficiaries of this management methodology, in the hands only and exclusively of a handful of witnesses.

The only reason why witnesses have acted like this. It is because they have seen their own way of acting reflected in what they have done to them. But overnight. Instead, it has taken years for them to absorb and control the entire platform.

Regular witnesses have earned their place through hard work. The new owner has earned the position by putting money. Real money, what can you count?

Neither case, is completely wrong. But, both are incorrect. No one thinks of the true wounded. Never.

The platform itself and the users with less earnings of Steemit. The platform itself and users with less Steemit earnings. Those that are absolutely necessary for this to continue to grow.
Not even the witnesses have thought about them (they only have time to manage projects with benefits, help curators and absorb all the contents of the platform). Nor the new owner: who has failed to convey an attractive message.

In summary. In both cases. They fight for the same. Centralization

The witnesses have been increasingly centralizing the entire platform and all the benefit in them; through other projects, from which they have always benefited.
Giving them everything in their favor.

In the meantime. The few users who do not have great benefits, but who nevertheless trust Steemit; and that despite everything, they have had enough eggs not to go to other platforms.

Some, we have been years. Absolutely tired of having to thank the witnesses and having to constantly lick their asses everywhere. As if they were the saviors of the world within Steemit.

If you have to invent so much game, application and bullshit around Steemit. It is exclusively because one reason: Because the content and the main place of the platform (the blog, share daily) collapsed absolutely and the vast majority of the witnesses turned it into a forum crap about Stem / steemit.

Exclusively.

And no, Steemit is not a forum on STEEM or at least that was not the idea.

I am sure that Steemit is perfectly capable of working without any extra.
Steemit has nothing to envy to Medium, dev.to, Blogger or any other Internet content web page.

Absolutely nothing.

But for that you need people who want to perform a thorough cleaning and organization of content, management and control.

Because steemit is today, and has been for two years: an absolute whorehouse.

You directly accuse @justinsunsteemit of centralization. When he has the absolute right to do whatever he wants; and you speak of witnesses as if they were heroes; when they have been centralizing every corner of the platform around their damn ass for more than two years.

There is almost no content on the entire platform, no application, no curator, no bots; that the witnesses do not control. And the one that exists, is dead content from the first second in which it is published. Because it is absolutely impossible, to receive money, or to receive visualization, or visits; because all that is controlled by the same people.

And you are in your damn chair. Speaking to the face of users like me. That I've been suffering all the trash they have generated for two years and how Steemit has evolved. Rather, as he has gone to hell.

You are telling me, that in Steemit there is decentralization? Are sure that it?

If you need to lick the brewery owner's ass to enter it. That is not decentralization, or freedom, or anything like that. Seriously.

And if the brewery instead of 1 has 30 or 40 owners. Do you know what happens?
The thing gets more and more fucked. Because the brewery goes from being an open brewery to everyone; and it becomes a brewery for those 40 friends, their colleagues, their family members and their friends' friends (I mean, their bots, their healers, their friends to whom they lend Steem Power. etc.) and finally.

That is the true reflection of what Steemit is today.
A brewery - quite large - of friends (witnees), who have fun with, by and for their friends (application owners, curators who lend them SP, bots ...)

And the users that generate traffic, to be able to have ads that are worth money?
And the users who like the content generated by those witnesses, or the curators who pay those witnesses?
And the users who generate their own communities, generating traffic, participating, entering regularly?
And users who don't talk about Steemit?

Where are they? I do not see them. Will I have gone blind? Not. It s true. They do not exist.

They have been expelled from here. Steemit should be a platform that attracts users, without any need or knowledge about the world of cryptocurrencies, to be here.

Discover things, publish, spend time. You know.. And it turns out it's the opposite.
A specialized network, with a higher learning line than that of a telecommunications engineering. And you still manage to learn that. It won't do you any good.

The average user: Enter steemit. Create an account. Look around, see the content that exists within Steemit and never re-enter. So. Run. Run far away. He runs so fast, as if he had heard a conversation between aliens.

Then I see your beloved witnesses cry. What because users do not participate? Etc. Etc. Etc. πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈπŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈπŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈπŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈπŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈπŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ

H2
H3
H4
3 columns
2 columns
1 column
Join the conversation now
Logo
Center