The Scientific Argument of Flat Earth Conspiracy Theory: What Did BJ Habibie Do?

As explained earlier, Flat Earth's theory is again discussed by the Indonesian public (including its Islamic activists) through forums in cyberspace. In fact, the flat earth conspiracy videos that are uploaded on Youtube are hot conversations on social media.

Unmitigated, supporters of the theory Flat Earth presents 10 arguments that the impression scientific to convince people that the earth is not round. Instead of presenting scientific experiments, the video series is mostly a source of google and cut scenes that support the theory of conspiracy theorists.

This time I deliberately wrote the sub-subject "What Habibie Did?". I purposely listed a scientist and the nation's best engineer, Bacharuddin Jusuf Habibie. Let my friends (and I) measure how far our knowledge is compared to this former Indonesian president.



Image Source


****USGS The Most Credible Geological Survey Institute****

Let's repeat that the USGS is a US-owned institution, containing scientists and using satellites to collect data. Yes! I repeat again let it clear, USGS uses satellites to collect data! Now the question is, what's the difference between USGS and NASA? Why USGS is credible and NASA is Holywood?

Earth Flat Map#

Okay .. If that question is too difficult, maybe someone will accuse me of not being very scientific if I judge a fact based on who's delivering it.

Therefore, I will try to understand any logic that USGS is credible and NASA does not.
You know not if because of this Flat Earth Theory (FET) thing I got to download the old world map whose resolution is very high just to understand Azimuthal Equidistance Projection.



Image Source


Now I have to admit something awesome and awesome, this is a fact that will make all Flat Earth fans happy. The fact is a flat earth map made by the USGS using Azimuthal Equidistance is 100% true.

The problem is how to use Azimuthal Equidistance Projection Map this? Oh yes, Azimuthal Equidistance Projection (AEP) was first proposed by Muslim scientist Al Biruni, let me know aja deh, but this has nothing to do with flat earth or ball.

The first time I found out about this, I was a little confused because there were so many maps of Azimuthal Equidistance Projection. In fact we can make AEP online (there is a generator). This is one example of AEP
london:https://www.jasondavies.com/maps/azimuth-distance/

In that map, the middle position is the city of London so that we see the world with the center of London. The map result is correct because it uses AEP, but the shape is different from the world map displayed by FET. Why is it different? Because the center point is different. The FET uses AEP with the north pole's center point while on the web it uses the center of London.


How to Use AEP#

The definition of Azimuthal Equidistance I have explained, now we discuss the rules of its use. Immediately I quote from the USGS web that became the main reference of the FET, it is said:

Distances and directions to all places true from point of projection. Distances correct between points along straight lines through center. All other distances incorrect. Any straight line drawn through center point is on a great circle. Distortion of areas and shapes increases away from center point.

This rule also exists submitted in video 5, but there it is explained with inconsequential and haphazard. Here I try to translate:

****Distance and direction to all places is true only from the projection center point. Correct distance between two points during through center point. All other distances are wrong. All the straight lines through the center are the shortest distance in the curved track of the earth. The deviation (incongruity) of the area and shape will increase with the farther from the center.****

****If we are talking about AEP maps used by FET, then we will see the map with the north pole as the midpoint. So:****

  • Distance and direction to all places is true only from the north pole (center point).

  • The true distance between two points during a line with the north pole (center point). (wrong direction)

  • All the straight lines through the north pole (center point) are the shortest distance in the earth's curved track.

  • The deviation of area and shape increases with the distance from the north pole.



Image Source


****Type:****

  • The distance and direction from the north pole to all places is true

  • The distance between two points is true if it is in line with the north pole. (the direction is not correct)

  • The shortest distance from the north pole to the south pole

  • This dashed line shows the shape of the south pole that has been distorted to its maximum shape and extent, because of its location which is very far from the north pole. (south pole shape is misguided)

How to Flat Earth Theory Using AEP#

At first glance, we must immediately say, "Wow! this is true! if you use a flat map of the earth everything is the closest distance because the path is a straight line. "Yep, exactly, I also think like that initially.

But since we already understand the rules of using AEP maps, immediately see which of those lines cross the north pole (center point)? Even whether there are two points that are in line with the north pole? There is no!

So based on the first rule of AEP, "The distance and direction to all places is true only from the north pole", there is the word "only if" there if it is not from the north pole, then all the distance and direction to another place is wrong either direction and distance.

So, how to use AEP in flight is specific to each airport. So suppose you are at Sukarno Hatta airport going to Santiago, then you will use AEP map with Sukarno Hatta center. When you depart from Santiago to Tokyo, you will use the AEP map with downtown Santiago. That's why there's an online AEP generator, because every place will produce different projections.

I'm a little lazy to find information about Admiral Byrd (or how to spell it). Repeat several times in the section, you will feel how speculative and most are guessing.

One of the reasons I'm lazy to find out about Byrd's expedition is because everything is just 'opinions', 'statements', and a variety of information that is easily deflected. I do not really like ngebahas this because it can not be proven. Well, if NASA has thousands of photographs from outer space alone it can not be trusted let alone just an Admiral's statement without photographs and mathematical equations.

What Habibie Did?#



Image Source


Is any of these blog readers smarter than BJ Habibie? Or does anyone think that the fifth video maker is smarter than BJ Habibie?

The former Indonesian president was the greatest scientist in Indonesian history, working in aeronautics for half his life. He already has a number of patents in aircraft manufacturing. Gravity, the slope of the earth, the plane's path.

With all his knowledge, intelligence and access to the outside world do you think that he will not realize that all this time NASA and scientists lied about the round shape of the earth? A basic fact of all the calculations he once did?

That is, if the flat earth is something that is scientific then the first Indonesian people who will realize it of course Prof. Bacharuddin Jusuf Habibie.

My opinion#

Basically the Freemason problem, Elite Global is just a diversion of views by video makers to trick us. If you repeat the video 1-5, you must realize that there is no concept of science in the videos.

It contained only beautiful words such as "no argument, no wrestling or debate" and a few other paragraphs about "global elite benefits". There are no important points in the opinion of Flat Earth Theory.

Gini deh. After watching the 5 videos, is there just one explanation of the applicable scientific laws in flat earth theory? Is there a scientific calculation done in the video? Is there an explanation of how they measure the close range of the sun? Is there any proof that the salve or firmament dome is real.

There is no science in the video, the video-makers do not understand science, because it's in the video spiced by conspiracies and other obscure discussions. Even the video creator tucked the movie trailers in each of his videos. Is that a scientific fact?


image

H2
H3
H4
3 columns
2 columns
1 column
Join the conversation now
Logo
Center