VHEMT, Voluntary Human Extinction Movement
This move, which basically calls people to call, advocates that the harm caused by the creation of human beings is now on the last radar, and that after that point the solution will come to an end with diminishing humanity.
The founder of the movement, Les U. Knight, says he only gave the name. Because we are all leaders of this movement.
In this website, where the Movement manifesto is located, it is stated that this movement should never be defined as an organization. The movement was initiated by people who live on Earth and attach importance to this life.
The facts that triggered the movement are the facts that all of us are screaming and disturbing.
There is a serious argument that the cause of terror in the world is humanity: the millions of animal and plant species are destroyed because of humanity, it is always a good thing that voluntary disappearance of mankind is one.
When humanity is destroyed, everything may not go better, that is not what motion cares about.
When humanity abandons the proliferation of the universe before humanity emerges anyhow how it is going back to the old or the way it will come. If this work leads to a different philosophy, according to advocates of action, this nature will be its own choice, not human selfishness.
If you think that these ideas are a metaphor or a neediness, you are mistaken.
The movement underlines that it is very serious. They do not ignore the humorous stance that is next to their seriousness, but when they do it they do not like a little 'entertainment' because they think that their pain is the worst. All they want is no one to blame, it would not hurt to do it happily, would it?
They claim that they are realistic about their success and that the truth will be adorned with their success.
Even in the belief systems, we have the kind of acceptance that the day will come when there is no human being on the earth we have pressed on the assumption that the end of mankind will come one day. They want to manage this process consciously and offer two options to their supporters, all of us.
Our limited options are as follows: To have fewer children or not to have children.
"Of course we believe that we are not able to prevent the deaths that would be caused by a catastrophic disaster that will be created by humans, and it is a good reason to bring another person to the world."
They are not humanity, but are reacting to what the minority of mankind has done. Therefore, they are trying to solve their solutions peacefully by talking. They are not the supporters of any mass massacre, they are also against such movements and ideas. They use their actions to use speech to overcome consciousness, freedom and generosity. "Humanity is not dead!" but they want humanity to die ...
The basic condition of participating in this movement is that they say 'change the head'.
What they have to do in order to save themselves without humanity is to not have children. They do not think it's an easy decision, but they insist that change will not come without personal sacrifice. Well, what do you think about this move?