I worked for over a decade designing and running UN projects under various climate change and global warming frameworks. These projects originally were for "carbon credit" purposes. Later, the UN altered things so that various consolidated aid funds such as the GEF would dole out money.
Carbon Credits were intended to be a combination of medieval Indulgences and tradeable certificates, a parallel of the equally scammy stock market.
The bottom fell out of carbon credit trading for much the same reason the dot com boom was false - it was all hype, people bought worthless paper thinking it would increase in value and a few scum traded on the gullibility of speculators.
Whenever you hear about "climate models" there are several points never mentioned by the borderline subnormal people who LARP as journalists, or by the "scientists" ie grant suckers at universities who create the fantasy world in which climate is a real thing able to be modelled rather than an aggregate of effects that defies any form of model.
Point 1
CLimate is 300 years of weather. That's all.
Point 2
What do we mean by weather? No one has the same answer as anyone else.
Point 3
Long before humanity in its current form existed, massive permanent changes occurred to the weather patterns of the Earth. Great drying-outs, huge ice ages with mile thick glaciers on top of what is now exposed dry land, and there is even evidence of much stranger global effects. Humanity didn't cause any of that.
Point 4
All climate modelling, UN projects, national initiatives and other scams use "boundary conditions". What this means in plain english is that the people creating the narrative pick and choose what to include in their calculations. For example volcanoes have a massive global effect on weather. They aren't included. CO2 has an unknown effect on weather. It's included. The sun and its solar storms have a measurable effect on weather. They aren't included. The sun and its interaction with our protective magnetic shroud affect world temperatures. Not included. Grass burnoffs in Africa are "traditional and have happened for thousands of years". Not included.
Point 5
"Clean" energy is one of those weasel word lying phrases beloved of the scum who market these lies. Bicycles are not polluting like cars, they tell you. True analysis says otherwise. True analysis requires LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS. From creation of the resources used to build the asset, through building, to final use. Yes, cars are polluting. But they also carry far more cargo and are generally vastly more useful than bicycles. Comparing functions and capacities, bicycles are massively ore polluting than cars due to the high polluton costs in manufacture and the vast number of pedal powered units needed to even equate to a single car. They are also not generally recycled. Cars are. They don't tell you that, do they?
Point 6
The hidden agenda is one of socialist wealth redistribution. This is stated openly at the conferences and seminars. It is hidden from the victimised citizens of the anglosphere who have to pay and pay and pay in the form of taxes as well as grossly inflated energy supply prices.
Point 7
Genuine elements and chemicals which pollute, include the black soot form of carbon, are not considered greenhouse gases. CO2, an essential component of all plant life on Earth and one that historically was at much higher levels than at present, is considered a dangerous chemical by the globalist scammers - at least in public.
Point 8
Remember all that crap about rainforests and forests in general and how they sequester carbon and we have to bury carbon in the trees trees trees? Water plants in the first metre of water depth worldwide consume 27 times more carbon than terrestrial plants. We could cut the entire forestry of the Earth down and it wouldn't make much difference to the carbon sequestration. Algae does virtually all of it. However deforestation has other horrifying effects and they are all ignored or covered up because the scammers have globalist interests in letting the backwards primitives of the third world, including third world countries that LARP at being advanced like India, China and Indonesia, cut their own forests down and cut down and steal the forests of any poor countries they can wrap their tentacles around.
Point 9
All governments have umpteen bureaucrat scum fiddling around doing nothing. In the case of climate change there are hundreds of thousands of bureaucrats in advanced nations who literally do nothing productive from one year to the next. Entire departments of the environment and climate change could be entirely abolished with no ill effect. Likewise many other bureaucracies. Out countries ran more efficiently when one of them existed!
Point 10
Australia is carbon positive due to low population and huge forests and grasslands. It doesn't need to do anything under the existing ridiculous rules. If the rules were changed to reflect real pollutants the main impact in Australia would be on coastal construction. That will never be allowed to happen because all the climate change scammers - own beach front properties and businesses. WHY WOULD THEY BUY WATERFRONT PROPERTY IF THE OCEANS ARE GOING TO RISE?
A crisis is real when the self appoint filth of the would-be elite act like it's real. Until then you are being scammed, financially raped and set to pay for the third worlders. They are also mass importing third worlders to carry out population replacement but that's another story - although it has detrimental environmental effects due to the animalistic primitive behaviour of the third worlders wherever they are.