But go ahead, Barbie, and then we'll go to Julie and or Ronald, whoever wants to jump in there. I was just going to say that before we prejudge people based on things that I don't necessarily think will be definitive, I think we should just look at their policy positions, at least stated policy positions, and past statements. We have a whole lot of past statements that you can look at from somebody like Steve Hilton.
He's been on Fox. You can see what he said about Trump, about various controversial things that have happened in the past. And that's what we should be looking at.
Not necessarily. I get it. We live in a world now where guilty by association is a thing, but it's going to be very hard to find anybody to run for anything ever again if we're going to use guilt by association as a standard.
Or someone who's successful, right? It's so ridiculous. You can't be successful and run. I mean, gosh, I think that's crazy.
We need people, good people to step up. And I think he's lived here since, I don't know, 2010, 2012. So it's been like 15 years.
And he loves the state obviously. He wouldn't be doing this otherwise. But it's a pain in the ass to do what he's doing.
It's not even a pain in the ass. It actually is a threat to your own life. So, you know, again, this goes back to understanding international and business and understanding corporate structure.
If you're going to get the backing in California to win, it has to come from Silicon Valley. JD Vance was created by Silicon Valley. So he's our vice president.
So if you're on the right wing and you like MAGA, I would like to hear the same energy about JD Vance then, right? We could have a whole conversation around that. Raise $15 million. Everybody was in the room.
We know how we got there. So are we going to go through that right now? See, this is why the right always fucking loses. It's because there's these moronic conversations made about, you know, with like red string.
