Performance metrics and organisational effectiveness is critical to the success of any decentralised organisation.
An evaluation is an assessment of something. In regards to Taupemist, an evaluation is the first service to be introduced within the performance tier. When members evaluate services, features, actions and provide feedback on them, this provides extremely valuable data concerning their effectiveness and utility. If evaluations are made often and are chronologically applied to incremental modifications, then the information that can be aggregated as a result can be essential in determining what works, what doesn't and what steps can be taken to improve.
Typically all new services and features should be evaluated as soon as it's existence, operation, or usage has the potential to provide data of any tangible value to the organisation. This includes all major releases and likely most if not all minor releases. Furthermore, all actions that are taken by members on the behalf of the organisation are also subject to evaluation.
The core data to be obtained from evaluations are ratings.
Through using their desired steem website (i.e. steemit.com), a member can submit an evaluation as a comment to the related post or as a new post on the steem blockchain.
EVALUATION
Title: Token Distribution v1.0
Rating: 3
Reason: Functioned correctly as described.
No, members are not required to participate in evaluations however evaluations may sometimes provide the most effective method for increasing the value of the organisation.
The member must currently possess sufficient TM to comply with the Taupemist Membership Table..
The most recent submissions will always take priority.
If you have any questions or uncertainties, then please ask via a reply to this post and/or in the official Taupemist telegram group
Thanks!
